• TSX -126.94 with commodity stocks bearing the brunt of the selloff as aluminum giant Alcoa Inc. delivered disappointing earnings and China moved to cool off a hot economy.
• DOW -36.73
• Dollar -.24c to 96.22cUS
• Oil -$1.73to $80.79US per barrel. the Chinese action to curtail economic growth put pressure on commodity prices because of concerns about a possible slowing of demand.
• Gold -$21.80 to $1,128.90USD per ounce
Canada falls back into trade deficit as dollar, low demand stalls exports
JULIAN BELTRAME, THE CANADIAN PRESS
THE CANADIAN PRESS, 2010
OTTAWA - Canada was pulled back into a trade deficit in November as the country faced twin headwinds of both a strong loonie and weaker demand for exports, after a surprisingly strong performance the previous month.
The value of exports from Canada rose 1.1 per cent from October, but imports jumped 3.9 per cent, producing a deficit of $344 million. In October, saw Canada posted its first trade surplus in months at $503 million.
In terms of volume, exports fell a disappointing 0.1 per cent in November, Statistics Canada reported.
Economists say with the loonie worth nearly as much as the American dollar, and potentially reaching parity within the year, the prospects for 2010 remain bleak for Canadian exporters.
"Don't look for a quick return to the halcyon days of big surpluses any time soon with domestic demand reviving faster than U.S. spending, and the Canadian dollar remaining lofty," BMO Capital Markets economist Douglas Porter wrote in an analysis of the trade data.
On Monday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper blamed soft international demand and the strong loonie for the weakness in Canada's manufacturing sector and slow jobs recovery.
But Export Development Canada offered some modest hope Tuesday, saying its semi-annual trade confidence index rose to 77.4 in the fall of 2009 from 68.5 during the spring.
"Trade is definitely in a growth mode, but we can't forget the starting point," said EDC chief economist Peter Hall. "Canadian exports took a 20 per cent hit in 2009, six times greater than any annual decline in recent memory. What exporters are saying is that they expect to start climbing out of that chasm."
And Hall believes exporters will be getting a break from the currency in the latter half of this year, although many other analysts see the loonie remaining near or above par with the U.S. dollar for most of 2010.
"We think the drivers of the currency are out of whack with reality," Hall explained. "Base metal prices seem a little too high and oil prices now are more indicative of an economy that is fully recovered than it actually is." Hall says he believes the Canadian dollar will slump to about 86 cents US in the second half of 2010, about 10 cents US lower than its current level.
Still, economists are not looking for a quick turnaround in Canada's trade performance.
TD Bank economist Dina Petramala said although goods exports are on track to record a 12 per cent annualized gain in the fourth quarter of 2009, she still expects Canada to stay in a trade deficit for most of this year.
She said weak U.S. demand for Canadian exports and the high dollar points to another year of struggle for the export sector. About 75 per cent of Canada's exports head to the U.S.
As well, a strong dollar has the effect of making imports more attractive to Canadians, further exacerbating the trade deficit.
In November, exports increased to $31.6 billion benefiting on the higher price of oil - the fifth increase in six months - as prices rose 1.1 per cent.
But in volume terms, exports actually slipped 0.1 per cent. And excluding energy products, exports fell 0.3 per cent.
Meanwhile, imports to Canada increased by $1.2 billion to $31.9 billion, almost offsetting the declines of the previous three months.
Most import sectors posted gains, with automotive products, machinery and equipment, and energy products accounting for the bulk of November's increase.
The exception was industrial goods and materials.
Exports to the United States rose two per cent while imports, which increased 3.8 per cent, accounted for almost two-thirds of the gain in overall imports.
As a result, Canada's trade surplus with the United States narrowed to $3.2 billion in November from $3.5 billion in October.
Exports to countries other than the United States fell 1.2 per cent while imports from these countries increased four per cent.
Consequently, Canada's trade deficit with countries other than the United States widened to $3.6 billion in November from $3 billion in October.
China takes new steps to curb bank lending
By Joe McDonald
BEIJING — China took new steps Tuesday to control bank lending, ordering institutions to set aside more reserves in a move to avert a surge in credit that Beijing worries might fuel inflation or asset price bubbles.
China’s nascent rebound from the global crisis was fuelled by a flood of lending by state-owned banks last year. Bankers cut lending under government orders toward the end of 2009 but regulators worry credit might rebound this year.
The move indicates Beijing is confident growth can be sustained and has shifted focus to preventing financial excesses and economic overheating. The government is forecasting growth of 8.3 per cent for 2009, up from a low of 6.1 per cent for the first quarter of the year.
The central bank raised the amount of reserves that banks must hold by 0.5 per cent to 15 per cent of their deposits. Also Tuesday, the bank raised interest rates paid on one-year bills for the first time since August to absorb money from the market and cool credit growth.
“This series of moves by the central bank provides a clear sign that policy-makers are following through on their pledge to guide credit in order to pre-empt rising inflation and avoid asset price bubbles,” said Jing Ulrich, chair of China equities for J.P. Morgan, in a report.
Chinese stock and real estate prices soared last year, driven in part by stimulus money being diverted to speculation. The central bank governor and others have called for measures to prevent a dangerous boom and bust in asset prices, warning that could hurt the economy and banks that are left with unpaid loans.
Beijing also is trying to curb an inflow of foreign “hot money” that is coming into China to speculate in stocks and real estate.
Chinese banks lent 8.95 trillion yuan ($1.3 trillion) in January-October, up from a total of 4.2 trillion yuan for all of 2008. Much of that was in the first half of the year and lending fell sharply after July, when regulators tightened regulations on loans to buy second homes and ordered banks to scrutinize borrowers more closely.
The recent measures appear to be aimed at preventing a return to the torrid lending of early 2009. Despite the lending curbs, Chinese leaders have repeatedly assured the public that stimulus spending would continue in 2010. They say the government will pay special attention to entrepreneurs who missed out on aid in the first year of the stimulus.
The spending has sent housing prices soaring in Beijing and Shanghai since late 2008. Prices have roughly doubled over the past three years to more than 12,000 yuan ($1,700) per square meter, according to a December report by the U.S. bond manager Pimco.
Neighbouring Russia is suffering from the opposite problem.
Lending there is weak because banks are afraid of incurring bad loans, the chair of its central bank, Sergei Ignatyev, told parliament last month. He said corporate lending is flat, and retail lending is declining.
The politically sensitive prices of food and consumer goods also are edging up. After nine months of decline, consumer prices rose 0.6 per cent in November from a year earlier.
The bank reserve rate now stands at 15 per cent, its highest level since Dec. 5, according to the Chinese financial data website Hexun.com.
Rural credit cooperatives were exempt from the increase to make sure they can lend enough for spring planting, the central bank said. Their reserve rate was left at 13.5 per cent, according to Hexun.com.
The boost in the interest rate on the one-year bill was the first since August. The central bank had raised the rate for its three-month bills on Thursday.
The increase in the reserve rate was announced after Chinese stock markets closed.
The country’s benchmark Shanghai Composite Index closed up 1.9 per cent, or 61.22 points, at 3,273.97 on Tuesday. The index was one of the world’s best performers in 2009, ending the year up 80 per cent after heavy stimulus spendin
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Financial Update For Jan. 12, 2010
• TSX -6.70
• DOW +45.80
• Dollar -.24c to 96.76cUS
• Oil -$.23to $82.52US per barrel.
• Gold +$12.50 to $1,150.70USD per ounce
How your mortgage can set you free of other debt
by Michelle Warren, Bankrate.com
Wednesday, January 6, 2010provided by
Credit crunch, debt crisis — call it what you will, but the current economic climate is spurring people to get their own finances in order. For Jack and Sarah Stewart, of Toronto, this means tackling the $40,000 in debt they've allowed to balloon during the past eight years. With their mortgage coming up for renewal, they're thinking of clearing the slate and rolling the burden into their mortgage.
"We want to consolidate our debt, but we're not sure if increasing our mortgage is the best way to do it," says Jack, who asked that his and his wife's names be changed to protect their privacy.
He's not alone. Laurie Campbell, executive director of Credit Canada, says it's a question people grapple with all the time. "Homes in the past have been your sacred cow," she says, referring to the drive to pay down one's mortgage as quickly as possible.
These days, however, with people juggling debts and paying varying rates of interest, increasing one's mortgage can be a smart move, even if it takes longer to pay off.
Lowering interest rates
Peter Majthenyi, a mortgage planner with Mortgage Architects, in Toronto, says it's a common theme as homeowners strive to bring down the overall interest they pay, as well as reduce their monthly obligations. He prefers to think of it as repositioning one's debt, and in his experience, "in almost all cases, it's justified."
"If you have debt that is sitting at 18 percent interest, then it certainly makes sense," says Campbell, adding that it's something to consider only if you have enough equity in your home and if your mortgage is coming up for renewal (read the fine print to find out if the penalties for breaking a mortgage outweigh the possible benefits).
Majthenyi notes that if you're working with the same lender, there's often no penalty involved with increasing your mortgage before the term expires.
The Stewarts seem like prime candidates. They have a $200,000 mortgage on a house worth about $425,000. They have plenty of equity, they're up for renewal at the end of the year and they say they're serious about getting their finances in order. Ideally, they'd roll the debt into their mortgage, continue an accelerated payment program whereby they pay every two weeks and they would not increase their amortization period, but instead increase their payments.
Dealing with debt
It's a good plan, says Campbell, who thinks all mortgage holders should accelerate their payments. She also likes the idea that they plan to stick to a 17-year amortization instead of renegotiating another 25-year mortgage. However, she stresses that none of this amounts to much if the Stewarts are going to continue the same spending habits and find themselves in a similar position five years from now. "They have to understand what got them into this $40,000 debt in the first place. They have to make sure they don't fall victim to that again."
She recommends cutting up credit cards, especially store cards, which have higher rates of interest, and not using one's line of credit like a bank account.
The Stewarts say the bulk of their debt was incurred for renovation costs, including a new kitchen and installing hardwood flooring, but admit their spending habits need a makeover. "We're always dipping in to our line of credit because we're strapped for cash," says Sarah Stewart. "I think if we consolidate the debt, it'll increase our cash flow and we'll be able to live within our means."
Jeanette Brox, a Certified Financial Planner with Investors Group in North York, Ont., always encourages her clients to look at the big picture when it comes to financial health: "My job is to make them think outside the box." She says helping people manage debt, while securing their future, is essential. "People need to think beyond what our parents did, which was paying down the mortgage," she says. "I used to think that way too, but I don't anymore."
In her view, the Stewarts and others like them need to take an aggressive approach if they ever want to get ahead. Not only do they need to improve cash flow, but they also need an emergency fund for unforeseen expenses, not to mention a retirement plan.
Planning for the future
Brox admits a lot of people would balk at the idea, but she thinks the Stewarts, both in their early 30s, should not only roll their debt into the mortgage, but increase their mortgage an additional $35,000 for a total of $275,000. To make payments more manageable, she'd also recommend increasing the amortization period to 25 years. She would invest $25,000 in mutual funds and further $10,000 in a money market account (earning about two percent interest).
"This is what I call a lifestyle fund," says Brox, adding that part of the interest cost on the mortgage would be tax deductible. "It's a win-win situation, but you've got to be really disciplined."
That means using their increased tax return to pay down the principal on the mortgage, thereby helping compensate for the interest cost of carrying the additional $35,000. The other bonus is that within five years (or so), the $25,000 registered retirement savings plan, or RRSP, will have grown to about $40,000. She stresses this is a long-term plan and people have to realize that the market is going to rise and fall.
"It's all based on comfort level," says Brox, adding that the biggest mistake she sees with people who reposition debt is that they don't have a long-term plan and, as Campbell, pointed out, go back to old spending habits. "People need to have their whole financial picture analyzed. It's something to consider, but you need to work with a planner or bank manager."
Lines of credit
There's a whole school of thinkers that shudder at the thought of increasing one's mortgage. At the core of this is that you're trading unsecured debt for secured debt and paying interest on that debt for the entire life of your mortgage, which can dramatically increase the cost of borrowing. In addition, refinancing also involves added legal costs (in most cases a minimum of $500). An alternative is consolidating debt onto a line of credit or home equity loan, which have higher interest rates than a mortgage, but can be paid off more quickly.
This works in theory, say our experts, but rarely in real life. "A lot of people just make the minimum payment and never get it cleaned up," says Brox.
"I'm wary of open lines of credit because they can easily stay at $50,000 forever," says Campbell, adding that an increased mortgage payment forces people to be more disciplined in paying down debt.
As for paying the debt for the entire length of your mortgage, all the experts stress that the way to combat this is by channelling extra funds back into the mortgage and paying off the mortgage early. This could mean accelerated payments, using tax returns or bumping up the payments. "We're putting all the money back into the principal of the mortgage," says Majthenyi, who points out that an extra $10,000 on a mortgage costs about $50 a month, while a $10,000 loan requires minimum payments of $300.
In the Stewart's case, it's costing them about $1,000 a month to cover $40,000 debt. If it's part of their mortgage, it translates into about $200. Ideally they'd direct the bulk of that money back into their mortgage through an annual lump payment or by increasing individual payments by a few hundred dollars.
Repositioning debt into one's mortgage is a sound option for people who are committed to changing bad habits and/or taking a long-term approach to getting their finances in order.
When it comes to money, Brox says that people need a big-picture plan, not a band-aid solution: "A lot of times it's not what you make but how you manage it."
• DOW +45.80
• Dollar -.24c to 96.76cUS
• Oil -$.23to $82.52US per barrel.
• Gold +$12.50 to $1,150.70USD per ounce
How your mortgage can set you free of other debt
by Michelle Warren, Bankrate.com
Wednesday, January 6, 2010provided by
Credit crunch, debt crisis — call it what you will, but the current economic climate is spurring people to get their own finances in order. For Jack and Sarah Stewart, of Toronto, this means tackling the $40,000 in debt they've allowed to balloon during the past eight years. With their mortgage coming up for renewal, they're thinking of clearing the slate and rolling the burden into their mortgage.
"We want to consolidate our debt, but we're not sure if increasing our mortgage is the best way to do it," says Jack, who asked that his and his wife's names be changed to protect their privacy.
He's not alone. Laurie Campbell, executive director of Credit Canada, says it's a question people grapple with all the time. "Homes in the past have been your sacred cow," she says, referring to the drive to pay down one's mortgage as quickly as possible.
These days, however, with people juggling debts and paying varying rates of interest, increasing one's mortgage can be a smart move, even if it takes longer to pay off.
Lowering interest rates
Peter Majthenyi, a mortgage planner with Mortgage Architects, in Toronto, says it's a common theme as homeowners strive to bring down the overall interest they pay, as well as reduce their monthly obligations. He prefers to think of it as repositioning one's debt, and in his experience, "in almost all cases, it's justified."
"If you have debt that is sitting at 18 percent interest, then it certainly makes sense," says Campbell, adding that it's something to consider only if you have enough equity in your home and if your mortgage is coming up for renewal (read the fine print to find out if the penalties for breaking a mortgage outweigh the possible benefits).
Majthenyi notes that if you're working with the same lender, there's often no penalty involved with increasing your mortgage before the term expires.
The Stewarts seem like prime candidates. They have a $200,000 mortgage on a house worth about $425,000. They have plenty of equity, they're up for renewal at the end of the year and they say they're serious about getting their finances in order. Ideally, they'd roll the debt into their mortgage, continue an accelerated payment program whereby they pay every two weeks and they would not increase their amortization period, but instead increase their payments.
Dealing with debt
It's a good plan, says Campbell, who thinks all mortgage holders should accelerate their payments. She also likes the idea that they plan to stick to a 17-year amortization instead of renegotiating another 25-year mortgage. However, she stresses that none of this amounts to much if the Stewarts are going to continue the same spending habits and find themselves in a similar position five years from now. "They have to understand what got them into this $40,000 debt in the first place. They have to make sure they don't fall victim to that again."
She recommends cutting up credit cards, especially store cards, which have higher rates of interest, and not using one's line of credit like a bank account.
The Stewarts say the bulk of their debt was incurred for renovation costs, including a new kitchen and installing hardwood flooring, but admit their spending habits need a makeover. "We're always dipping in to our line of credit because we're strapped for cash," says Sarah Stewart. "I think if we consolidate the debt, it'll increase our cash flow and we'll be able to live within our means."
Jeanette Brox, a Certified Financial Planner with Investors Group in North York, Ont., always encourages her clients to look at the big picture when it comes to financial health: "My job is to make them think outside the box." She says helping people manage debt, while securing their future, is essential. "People need to think beyond what our parents did, which was paying down the mortgage," she says. "I used to think that way too, but I don't anymore."
In her view, the Stewarts and others like them need to take an aggressive approach if they ever want to get ahead. Not only do they need to improve cash flow, but they also need an emergency fund for unforeseen expenses, not to mention a retirement plan.
Planning for the future
Brox admits a lot of people would balk at the idea, but she thinks the Stewarts, both in their early 30s, should not only roll their debt into the mortgage, but increase their mortgage an additional $35,000 for a total of $275,000. To make payments more manageable, she'd also recommend increasing the amortization period to 25 years. She would invest $25,000 in mutual funds and further $10,000 in a money market account (earning about two percent interest).
"This is what I call a lifestyle fund," says Brox, adding that part of the interest cost on the mortgage would be tax deductible. "It's a win-win situation, but you've got to be really disciplined."
That means using their increased tax return to pay down the principal on the mortgage, thereby helping compensate for the interest cost of carrying the additional $35,000. The other bonus is that within five years (or so), the $25,000 registered retirement savings plan, or RRSP, will have grown to about $40,000. She stresses this is a long-term plan and people have to realize that the market is going to rise and fall.
"It's all based on comfort level," says Brox, adding that the biggest mistake she sees with people who reposition debt is that they don't have a long-term plan and, as Campbell, pointed out, go back to old spending habits. "People need to have their whole financial picture analyzed. It's something to consider, but you need to work with a planner or bank manager."
Lines of credit
There's a whole school of thinkers that shudder at the thought of increasing one's mortgage. At the core of this is that you're trading unsecured debt for secured debt and paying interest on that debt for the entire life of your mortgage, which can dramatically increase the cost of borrowing. In addition, refinancing also involves added legal costs (in most cases a minimum of $500). An alternative is consolidating debt onto a line of credit or home equity loan, which have higher interest rates than a mortgage, but can be paid off more quickly.
This works in theory, say our experts, but rarely in real life. "A lot of people just make the minimum payment and never get it cleaned up," says Brox.
"I'm wary of open lines of credit because they can easily stay at $50,000 forever," says Campbell, adding that an increased mortgage payment forces people to be more disciplined in paying down debt.
As for paying the debt for the entire length of your mortgage, all the experts stress that the way to combat this is by channelling extra funds back into the mortgage and paying off the mortgage early. This could mean accelerated payments, using tax returns or bumping up the payments. "We're putting all the money back into the principal of the mortgage," says Majthenyi, who points out that an extra $10,000 on a mortgage costs about $50 a month, while a $10,000 loan requires minimum payments of $300.
In the Stewart's case, it's costing them about $1,000 a month to cover $40,000 debt. If it's part of their mortgage, it translates into about $200. Ideally they'd direct the bulk of that money back into their mortgage through an annual lump payment or by increasing individual payments by a few hundred dollars.
Repositioning debt into one's mortgage is a sound option for people who are committed to changing bad habits and/or taking a long-term approach to getting their finances in order.
When it comes to money, Brox says that people need a big-picture plan, not a band-aid solution: "A lot of times it's not what you make but how you manage it."
Monday, January 11, 2010
Financial Update For Jan. 11, 2010
• TSX +66.3
• DOW +11.33
• Dollar +.38c to 97.00cUS
• Oil +$.09to $82.75US per barrel.
• Gold +$5.10 to $1,138.20USD per ounce
Bad numbers, but good news
Hope remains despite rise in U.S. jobless figures
Ian McGugan, Financial Post
Wall Street is looking for a happy ending to the Great Recession. Now if it can just get the facts to agree.
Many forecasters had expected yesterday's release of U.S. payroll data to show that the world's largest economy was no longer destroying jobs. Instead, the U.S. Labor Department reported that nonfarm payrolls continued to shrink, shedding 85,000 jobs this past month.
There were bright spots in the lacklustre report. Most notably, November figures were revised upward to show that the economy gained a handful of jobs during that month. It was the first time in two years that U.S. payrolls have managed to eke out any increase.
Overall, though, the U.S. unemployment rate remains stubbornly high at 10% of the workforce. About 15 million people are unemployed, double the number of two years ago.
The continuing pace of job destruction should raise concerns about the gap between the sunny views of the recovery propounded by Wall Street and the darker reality that appears to be prowling Main Street. While stocks are surging, the real economy isn't.
This is distinctly unusual. Stocks usually suffer during periods of rising unemployment because unemployment typically goes hand-in-hand with falling corporate profits. Declining profits make stocks less attractive.
In this downturn, though, stock markets have taken off like a rocket despite rising unemployment. The S&P 500 has advanced by 70% since March, although about two million jobs have been destroyed during those months.
One force driving stock prices higher is massive stimulus spending by government. Another is near-zero interest rates, which make the future stream of dividends from stocks that much more valuable.
But stimulus spending and low interest rates can't keep a stock market up forever. Japan provides the ultimate proof of that. Despite massive government spending and near zero interest rates for much of the past two decades, the Nikkei stock index trades for about a quarter of what it did back in the glory days of the 1980s.
Based on the ratio of its current price to its earnings over the past 10 years, the U.S. stock market is trading at valuations well below its dot-com levels, but about 30% above its average levels. Stocks could take a tumble if the unemployment picture -- and the profit picture -- don't start to recover soon.
Many traders believe such a recovery is well in progress. First-time claims for unemployment benefits have been dwindling, and job losses have grown steadily smaller since the darkest days of early 2009, when nearly 700,000 U.S. workers were being thrown out of work each month.
The small gain of 4,000 jobs in November is invisible compared to the entire U.S. workforce of about 150 million people, but any jobs number with a plus sign these days constitutes a victory in the recovery story. "The fact that positive job creation occurred in November 2009 is a very important fact, one that should not be ignored despite the headline print in December," says Ian Pollick of TD Securities.
Another positive sign is the continued increase in temporary help services, which added 47,000 positions in December. This was the fifth-consecutive monthly increase in the sector and suggests that employers are feeling out opportunities, although they're still reluctant to hire full-time workers.
A further jolt of good news may be in store thanks to the U.S. Census. The once-a-decade count of every American takes place on April 1 and hiring for the survey will provide as many as a million jobs during the first half of 2010.
Derek Holt and Karen Cordes of Scotia Capital believe the combined effects of census hiring and the natural recovery process could propel job creation in the U.S. far past expectations and create two million jobs in 2010. While those new jobs would only partially replace the seven million jobs that have been lost over the past couple of years, they would at least signal an end to the current downturn.
But there is the risk of a double-dip recession if Congress and the Federal Reserve decide to remove stimulus too early. Holt and Cordes, as well as Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, worry that any sudden improvement in the jobs numbers could lead to a premature hike in interest rates and withdrawal of stimulus.
If there is any undeniably good news in yesterday's disappointing numbers, it's that nobody will be agitating to hike interest rates or remove stimulus anytime soon. The Great Recovery remains a work in progress.
20,600 Total U.S. jobs lost among women 25 and over.
13,400 Full-time U.S. jobs lost among women 25 and over.
December job losses reality check
8.5% unemployed
Paul Vieira, Financial Post
OTTAWA - Financial markets were dealt a reality check yesterday with disappointing December jobs data from Canada and, more notably, the United States signalling an uneven and choppy recovery, and prompting U.S. analysts to scale back expectations on rate hikes.
Analysts noted, however, that an improving trend is definitely emerging in both countries. Furthermore, some reckon unemployment levels in Canada may have peaked.
Statistics Canada said the economy lost 2,600 jobs last month, but the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 8.5%. Markets expected 20,000 new jobs in December, after an off-the-chart 79,000 gain in November.
"It's looking more believable by the day that the 8.7% jobless rate in August will mark the peak for the cycle, far below past recession highs -- 13% in 1982 and 12.1% in 1992 -- and no worse than the average unemployment rate in Canada over the past 30 years," said Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist at BMO Capital Markets.
Stewart Hall, economist at HSBC Securities Canada, said there was "palatable" disappointment given the big gain in November. But the fact the economy held onto most of those jobs "is in and of itself fairly significant," he said.
With the December figures in hand, they suggest the Canadian economy shed 240,000 jobs in 2009 -- the bulk of which occurred in the first half of the year. In the last five months of the year, the economy generated an average of 20,000 new jobs per month.
Mr. Hall said average monthly gains of 20,000 are likely in the offing, as this recovery is likely to mirror the one following the recession of the early 1990s. "One characterized by some jobs growth followed by consolidation. Not terrific, but infinitely preferable to the experience of the previous year."
The Canadian recession ended in the third quarter with meagre annualized growth of 0.4%, as domestic strength was offset by a weak export sector that was hampered by a strong Canadian dollar and weak U.S. demand. Economists estimate growth in the final three months of 2009 to register between 3% and 4%.
The Bank of Canada is expected to begin raising its benchmark lending rate in the third quarter. There is less confidence about near-term tightening from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said non-farm employment in December fell 85,000, compared to expectations for no change. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 10%, although analysts note it was due to a plunge in the labour force, as people stopped looking for work.
"Firms are still bent on boosting productivity and remain cautious about hiring," analysts from London-based Capital Economics said of the U.S. data.
The yield on the two-year U.S. Treasury note -- a market gauge of interest rate expectations -- dropped yesterday below 1%, indicating analysts believe the likelihood of a Fed rate hike has been "pushed out for a few more months," Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of U.S. fixed-income strategy at Barclays PLC in New York, told Bloomberg News.
The U.S. bureau noted, however, that during 2009 monthly job losses moderated, from an average 691,000 in the first quarter to 69,000 in the fourth quarter. Also, the bureau revised data for November indicating the U.S. economy created 4,000 jobs -- the first monthly gain in more than two years.
Still, Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at CIBC World Markets, said the 10% U.S. jobless rate masks the "true extent" of labour slack, "as it ignores those working part-time involuntarily [and] those who gave up looking for work."
• DOW +11.33
• Dollar +.38c to 97.00cUS
• Oil +$.09to $82.75US per barrel.
• Gold +$5.10 to $1,138.20USD per ounce
Bad numbers, but good news
Hope remains despite rise in U.S. jobless figures
Ian McGugan, Financial Post
Wall Street is looking for a happy ending to the Great Recession. Now if it can just get the facts to agree.
Many forecasters had expected yesterday's release of U.S. payroll data to show that the world's largest economy was no longer destroying jobs. Instead, the U.S. Labor Department reported that nonfarm payrolls continued to shrink, shedding 85,000 jobs this past month.
There were bright spots in the lacklustre report. Most notably, November figures were revised upward to show that the economy gained a handful of jobs during that month. It was the first time in two years that U.S. payrolls have managed to eke out any increase.
Overall, though, the U.S. unemployment rate remains stubbornly high at 10% of the workforce. About 15 million people are unemployed, double the number of two years ago.
The continuing pace of job destruction should raise concerns about the gap between the sunny views of the recovery propounded by Wall Street and the darker reality that appears to be prowling Main Street. While stocks are surging, the real economy isn't.
This is distinctly unusual. Stocks usually suffer during periods of rising unemployment because unemployment typically goes hand-in-hand with falling corporate profits. Declining profits make stocks less attractive.
In this downturn, though, stock markets have taken off like a rocket despite rising unemployment. The S&P 500 has advanced by 70% since March, although about two million jobs have been destroyed during those months.
One force driving stock prices higher is massive stimulus spending by government. Another is near-zero interest rates, which make the future stream of dividends from stocks that much more valuable.
But stimulus spending and low interest rates can't keep a stock market up forever. Japan provides the ultimate proof of that. Despite massive government spending and near zero interest rates for much of the past two decades, the Nikkei stock index trades for about a quarter of what it did back in the glory days of the 1980s.
Based on the ratio of its current price to its earnings over the past 10 years, the U.S. stock market is trading at valuations well below its dot-com levels, but about 30% above its average levels. Stocks could take a tumble if the unemployment picture -- and the profit picture -- don't start to recover soon.
Many traders believe such a recovery is well in progress. First-time claims for unemployment benefits have been dwindling, and job losses have grown steadily smaller since the darkest days of early 2009, when nearly 700,000 U.S. workers were being thrown out of work each month.
The small gain of 4,000 jobs in November is invisible compared to the entire U.S. workforce of about 150 million people, but any jobs number with a plus sign these days constitutes a victory in the recovery story. "The fact that positive job creation occurred in November 2009 is a very important fact, one that should not be ignored despite the headline print in December," says Ian Pollick of TD Securities.
Another positive sign is the continued increase in temporary help services, which added 47,000 positions in December. This was the fifth-consecutive monthly increase in the sector and suggests that employers are feeling out opportunities, although they're still reluctant to hire full-time workers.
A further jolt of good news may be in store thanks to the U.S. Census. The once-a-decade count of every American takes place on April 1 and hiring for the survey will provide as many as a million jobs during the first half of 2010.
Derek Holt and Karen Cordes of Scotia Capital believe the combined effects of census hiring and the natural recovery process could propel job creation in the U.S. far past expectations and create two million jobs in 2010. While those new jobs would only partially replace the seven million jobs that have been lost over the past couple of years, they would at least signal an end to the current downturn.
But there is the risk of a double-dip recession if Congress and the Federal Reserve decide to remove stimulus too early. Holt and Cordes, as well as Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, worry that any sudden improvement in the jobs numbers could lead to a premature hike in interest rates and withdrawal of stimulus.
If there is any undeniably good news in yesterday's disappointing numbers, it's that nobody will be agitating to hike interest rates or remove stimulus anytime soon. The Great Recovery remains a work in progress.
20,600 Total U.S. jobs lost among women 25 and over.
13,400 Full-time U.S. jobs lost among women 25 and over.
December job losses reality check
8.5% unemployed
Paul Vieira, Financial Post
OTTAWA - Financial markets were dealt a reality check yesterday with disappointing December jobs data from Canada and, more notably, the United States signalling an uneven and choppy recovery, and prompting U.S. analysts to scale back expectations on rate hikes.
Analysts noted, however, that an improving trend is definitely emerging in both countries. Furthermore, some reckon unemployment levels in Canada may have peaked.
Statistics Canada said the economy lost 2,600 jobs last month, but the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 8.5%. Markets expected 20,000 new jobs in December, after an off-the-chart 79,000 gain in November.
"It's looking more believable by the day that the 8.7% jobless rate in August will mark the peak for the cycle, far below past recession highs -- 13% in 1982 and 12.1% in 1992 -- and no worse than the average unemployment rate in Canada over the past 30 years," said Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist at BMO Capital Markets.
Stewart Hall, economist at HSBC Securities Canada, said there was "palatable" disappointment given the big gain in November. But the fact the economy held onto most of those jobs "is in and of itself fairly significant," he said.
With the December figures in hand, they suggest the Canadian economy shed 240,000 jobs in 2009 -- the bulk of which occurred in the first half of the year. In the last five months of the year, the economy generated an average of 20,000 new jobs per month.
Mr. Hall said average monthly gains of 20,000 are likely in the offing, as this recovery is likely to mirror the one following the recession of the early 1990s. "One characterized by some jobs growth followed by consolidation. Not terrific, but infinitely preferable to the experience of the previous year."
The Canadian recession ended in the third quarter with meagre annualized growth of 0.4%, as domestic strength was offset by a weak export sector that was hampered by a strong Canadian dollar and weak U.S. demand. Economists estimate growth in the final three months of 2009 to register between 3% and 4%.
The Bank of Canada is expected to begin raising its benchmark lending rate in the third quarter. There is less confidence about near-term tightening from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said non-farm employment in December fell 85,000, compared to expectations for no change. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 10%, although analysts note it was due to a plunge in the labour force, as people stopped looking for work.
"Firms are still bent on boosting productivity and remain cautious about hiring," analysts from London-based Capital Economics said of the U.S. data.
The yield on the two-year U.S. Treasury note -- a market gauge of interest rate expectations -- dropped yesterday below 1%, indicating analysts believe the likelihood of a Fed rate hike has been "pushed out for a few more months," Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of U.S. fixed-income strategy at Barclays PLC in New York, told Bloomberg News.
The U.S. bureau noted, however, that during 2009 monthly job losses moderated, from an average 691,000 in the first quarter to 69,000 in the fourth quarter. Also, the bureau revised data for November indicating the U.S. economy created 4,000 jobs -- the first monthly gain in more than two years.
Still, Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at CIBC World Markets, said the 10% U.S. jobless rate masks the "true extent" of labour slack, "as it ignores those working part-time involuntarily [and] those who gave up looking for work."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
