Financial Update For March 19, 2010

• TSX -60.65 A continuing Greek debt crisis helped push the TSX lower, with commodity stocks dampened by worries an already shaky global economic recovery could have the wind knocked out of it should EU bailout efforts fail.
• DOW +45.50
• Dollar -.46c to 98.61cUS
• Oil -$.92 to $82.01US per barrel.
• Gold +$1.00 to $1,125.00 USD per ounce
Generating 70% replacement ratio to retire at 65, requires 35 years of saving 10-20% of income Jonathon Chevreau, Financial Post
Canadians hoping to "replace" 70% of their working income when retiring at 65 will need to save a "very high" portion of their annual pre-retirement earnings, says a C.D. Howe Institute study released today. Depending on their earned income while working, they will need to save between 10 and 21% of their pre-tax earnings every year: for 35 consecutive years between age 30 and 65, says the report, titled The Piggy Bank Index: Matching Canadians' Savings Rates to Their Retirement Dreams. The full 10-page e-brief can be found by clicking here. [If you have trouble with the link, as I did, copy it and paste it directly into your browser.]
Limits on tax-assisted savings prevent most high-earners from replacing 70% of working incomes
The authors -- David A. Dodge, Alexandre Laurin and Colin Busby -- say Canadians face obstacles in saving more. "The problem is that although private savings allow choice about retirement age and income, the Income Tax Act limits on tax-recognized savings may prevent many higher income earners from accumulating sufficient RRSP savings to securely replace 70% of their final earnings."
In a press release, former Governor of the Bank of Canada David Dodge [pictured above] said the findings provide "a ‘reality check' about the saving rates required to meet [Canadians'] retirement goals and inform the choices they could have to make between working longer or consuming less and saving more."
The authors assume a 3% real return on investments, despite the fact 4% is the historical norm. They assume inflation will average 2% a year and that public pensions like the CPP/QPP and Old Age Security will continue in their present form.
While a 70% replacement ratio is considered the "gold standard" an appendix provides calculations for more modest income replacement ratios of 60% and 50%.
Only "working poor" can get by saving less than 10% of gross earnings
It finds that with the exception of what it calls "the working poor," most Canadians must save 10 to 21% of gross earnings every year to get to the 70% replacement ratio in retirement. "This fraction is likely higher than many Canadians believe and higher than is set aside in most employer-based group RSPs or defined-contribution plans," the authors write, "It is also higher than the effective contribution over time to many employer-sponsored defined-benefits plans, and for high-income earners exceeds the annual limits placed on RRSP contributions."
Note that last point, given an earlier CD Howe recommendation that RRSP contribution limits be almost doubled from the current 18% of earned income and $22,000 maximum to 34% and $42,000 respectively, as reported in this blog here early in February. The recent federal budget ignored the recommendation but indicated further consultation will occur in the spring. In today's e-brief, the institute adds that "Income Tax Act limits would prevent many earners from accumulating enough RRSP savings over 33 years (by age 63) to replace 70% or more of their working income."
Delaying retirement to age 67 so you save for 37 years reduces the fraction that must be saved somewhat, "but the required saving rate still remains high," the brief says, "People wishing to retire even earlier at 63 face even higher costs."
Delaying saving past 30 means saving more than 20% of income
And as all the nation's banks tell us during RRSP season, delaying the commencement of saving past age 30 means eventually having to save what the institute calls "extraordinarily large fractions of income -- more than 20%" for many above-average earners during the last decade of one's working years.
The paper concludes on a public policy note, saying the debate on how to improve our pension system is "well founded." Policy changes can improve incentives to save for retirement and to more efficiently manage retirement savings. But CD Howe's final line in the brief could have been written by virtually any financial planner or advisor: "In the end, if Canadians want high incomes and consumption in their retirement years, they will have to save more of their incomes and forgo more consumption during their earning years."
Malcolm Hamilton: dreams "shattered" only if you accept 70% replacement target
Asked for his reaction to the paper, Mercer's actuary Malcolm Hamilton -- pictured left from a Wealthy Boomer video interview last year -- said he had read an earlier draft but little appears to have changed. Here, unfiltered by me and only lightly edited, is his input sent by email. I've italicized it to make it clear the authorship is his, not mine. I've added the subheads in bold:
The paper shows that:
* If you want to replace 70% of your gross income when you retire at 65, and
* If you earn an above average wage,
then you need to save quite a bit from a rather young age (30). If you want to retire early with that same standard of living, you need to save even more. The conclusions are very sensitive to assumptions about future returns, but that's the way it is.

The big question is whether you need to replace 70% of your gross income to preserve your standard of living when you retire. Most Canadians retire with closer to 50% replacement. Most say that their quality of life is as good or better after retirement than before. As you know, I always felt that 50% would preserve the standard of living of the average family of 4 because a large percentage of their pre retirement income (often 40% to 50%) is consumed by kids, mortgages and taxes.
50% replacement ratio may suffice to preserve low standard of living while working
All of these burdens are hopefully gone by the time they retire. Their pre retirement standard of living is low. The good news is that they don't need to save much to preserve this low standard of living. One of the tables in the report concludes that those with average earnings can retire with 50% replacement at age 65 by saving only 5% of their incomes ... as compared to 11% if they want 70% replacement.

I do worry about the message accompanying the paper ... in essence that Canadians are saving too little and that their dreams will be shattered when they retire. This is true if we accept the 70% target. But it is not true if the target is wrong, and no evidence is offered in support of the 70% target. In essence, if you assume that everyone needs more than they really need when they retire, you conclude that everyone's dream will be shattered ... but so what?
Obsessive retirement saving shouldn't come at cost of raising families
We need to strive for a more balanced perspective. Yes, we want people to have adequate incomes when they retire. But we also want them to have adequate incomes when they are carrying a mortgage and raising their children. Telling them to save obsessively solves the first problem but exacerbates the second. And from my perspective, the second problem may
be the bigger one.

Financial Update For March 18, 2010

High Canadian dollar here to stay, economists say
• TSX +80.60 to 12,100 as commodity prices rose in the wake of the U.S. Federal Reserve's announcement that it will leave interest rates at historic lows and said it would keep rates unchanged "for an extended period."
• DOW +47.69 after the U.S. and Japanese central banks chose to keep interest rates low and the Senate passed a key jobs bill.
• Dollar +.36c to 98.98cUS A solid reading on January wholesale sales helped push the loonie as high as 99.31 cents US at one point during the session.
• Oil +$1.01 to $82.71US per barrel.
• Gold +$2.00 to $1,125.20 USD per ounce

In economic news, Statistics Canada said wholesales sales in current dollars rose the strongest in three years by 3% to $44.4 billion in January. The growth in January was contributed by all the sectors, with automotive products, building materials, machinery and electronic equipments recording notable gains

High Canadian dollar here to stay, economists say

By The Canadian Press OTTAWA - The high Canadian dollar appears to be here to stay despite what the Bank of Canada or inflation do to impact the currency.
Economists say the loonie, which jumped past 99 cents US on Wednesday, could hit parity at any time.

And unlike two years ago when the currency fell off the parity perch against the U.S. greenback as quickly as it had climbed, this time there will be no sudden retreat.

Under normal circumstances, Friday's inflation numbers should provide a downward draft to the loonie's flight.

The consensus of economists is for inflation, which hit 1.9 per cent in January, to fall all the way back to 1.4 per cent in February's data.

That won't matter, however, says TD deputy chief economist Craig Alexander.

He says the markets have already priced in that inflation will be low going forward, as they have that the Bank of Canada will likely move well before the U.S. Federal Reserve in raising interests rates.

Whether the loonie is slightly below parity, at parity or a little above, Alexander says the key point is that Canadians should expect the currency to remain strong for some time.

Also pushing up the currency is the perception that Canada's resources-based economy will continue to benefit from high oil and mineral prices.

Industry Minister Tony Clement said Canadian businesses are learning to live with the new reality.

"Obviously, historically it's been an issue for Canada," he said of the negative impact of a strong currency on industry.

"What we're seeing," he added, "is that Canadian manufacturers and other exporters are learning to live with the higher dollar."

http://ca.news.finance.yahoo.com/s/17032010/2/biz-finance-high-canadian-dollar-stay-economists-say.html

When it comes to mortgage details, most people just 'zone out'
James Pasternak, Financial Post
It is a legal document that stretches about 30 pages and runs about 10,000 words. Its execution takes no more than a couple minutes and when the ink dries on the signature lines, more times than not it is never read and gets slipped into a file folder, largely forgotten.

But despite its casual handling, the residential mortgage agreement governs the largest debt of over 5 million Canadians and within its fine print are the provisions that can make or break a household's financial future. There's a lot at stake. At the beginning of 2004, Canadians held $517.7-billion in mortgages.

"I think most of the major bank representatives do a good job of explaining these provisions to their clients but I think most people zone out and don't really listen. All they think about is getting a mortgage at 3.8% and ‘I want to get this done'," says Len Rodness, Partner, of Toronto-based law firm Torkin Manes (www.torkinmanes.com)

But beyond the interest rate there are a wide range of options and clauses in the mortgage agreement that deserve scrutiny. In a competitive lending environment, shopping for the right mortgage can bring significant savings and peace of mind through the amortization period.

Take the case of Hamilton, Ont., couple Kathy Funke and Dan Perryman. When they were shopping for a home in 2003, the interest rate was the top priority. They also wanted flexible prepayment options and accelerated weekly mortgage payments. To leverage the competitive interest rate they received, they went with a variable rate mortgage. They paid off a $230,000 mortgage in 5 ½ years.

"The power in these things comes from people who know how to manage [the] various privileges. It has a huge [savings] effect on amortization....The ideal thing is to understand what your privileges are and then combine them to your advantage -- to what you can afford to do; to fit your lifestyle and ability to pay," says Jeff Atlin of Thornhill, Ont. based Abacus Mortgages Inc.

And privileges there are. You just have to shop for them.
Accelerated Payment Options: Getting the loan paid earlier
It just seemed like yesteryear when everyone was paying their mortgage on the 1st of every month. Now, in addition to the first of the month option, some of the more common options are accelerated weekly and biweekly or semi-monthly options.

These frequency options result in long term savings. For example if one selects the accelerated biweekly option one is making 26 payments in a year, the equivalent of two prepayments per year over the monthly option. When a $150,000 mortgage amortized over 25 years is paid under an accelerated bi-weekly option, the debt is retired in 21 years and the interest savings are around $18,000.

Toronto resident and electrician Karl Klos, 26, selected "weekly rapid" payments on a mortgage amortized over 35 years. The mortgage payments are made each week but he added the "rapid" option by increasing the amount paid. Mr. Klos says that the payment frequency will pay off his mortgage in 25 years instead of 35 years.
"I can't understand why anybody would do monthly payments anymore now that the banks offer the ability to have weekly payments. It may be a cash flow situation. If you do a weekly mortgage payment it could save you a significant amount of money," says real estate lawyer Len Rodness.

Restating mortgage agreement vows
It doesn't take long after one signs a mortgage agreement to hear from a neighbour or friend that they received a better rate. So when you dig out the mortgage agreement see if there's a clause that allows borrowers to renegotiate their agreement before the end of the term. The bank might use a model called "blend and extend." For example, if one has a $100,000 mortgage at 6% mortgage with two years to go they might blend it with the current five year rate of 3.79%. So according to mortgage broker Atlin when they average out 2/5 of the mortgage at 6% and 3/5 are at 3.79%, the customer will get a new reduced rate of about 4.6%. But the borrower is tied to the bank for another 5 years.

Putting spare cash against the mortgage with no penalty
Almost all mortgage agreements have options for mortgage prepayment without penalty. Klos's mortgage agreement allows prepayments of up to 15% of the annual balance. Most financial institutions provide prepayment options in the 10-20% range. Some lenders allow borrowers to make the prepayment any time during the year while other agreements restrict the prepayment to the anniversary date.

Also, some financial institutions allow customers to make multiple smaller prepayments during the year as long as they don't exceed the annual limit. Funke and Perryman were able to retire their $230,000 mortgage in 5 ½ years primarily because of the prepayment provisions in their mortgage.

Coming up with more money for each payment
Some lenders will allow borrowers to increase the payments without penalty. Depending on the wording of the mortgage agreement the increased payments can range from around 15% to 100% of the current payment. So if one is paying $1,000 per month under the 15% rule, a borrower can raise it to $1,150 per month. Klos's weekly rapid payment plan was based on him raising the weekly payments by 5%.

"Payment and amortization are a function of each other. Any time you raise the payments you shorten the amortization; any time you shorten the amortization you raise the payment," says Mr. Atlin.

The mortgage prenuptial: Penalties for getting out of your mortgage
"A mortgage is a contract first and foremost. It is a contract between a borrower and the lender," Atlin says. And if someone hasn't felt that cold business approach during the course of their mortgage, they certainly will if they try to leave early. Most borrowers pay out their mortgages when they sell their house, win a lottery or are offered a better interest rate by another company. Until recent years, the standard penalty for breaking a mortgage agreement was three months of interest. Paying out a $200,000 mortgage could amount to a $2,500 penalty.

In many current mortgage agreements, the penalty for an early exit (and not extending) is either three months of interest or an interest differential, whichever is greatest.

The mortgage differential penalty can be quite expensive. If a mortgage is at 5% interest rate and you have three years left in your term, the bank will use the difference between the agreement rate and the current market rate to calculate the penalty. Using the 5% case above, let's say the current 3-year mortgage is available at 3.5%. The bank will charge the difference between 5% and 3.5% for the balance of your term.

Bank customers who have an open mortgage with a variable rate can usually pay them out with little or no penalty. Some mortgages are closed for the first few years and then revert to an open option. The penalties, if there are any, would be much lower once the mortgage converts to an open one. If one can, it would be best to wait until the mortgage kicks into open status.

When paying out the mortgage try to have some of it calculated as your annual no-penalty prepayment option. Therefore, if you are paying out a $200,000 mortgage and you also have a 20% per annum prepayment option you might be able to save penalties on $40,000. If the mortgage prepayments can only be done on the anniversary date, make sure that is the day you select to pay out the mortgage.
Mortgage Lifelines

Mortgages are often signed and sealed with the borrower having every intention to pay. However, the world is paved with best intentions and recessions are everyone else's problem until the boss comes into your office with the bad news.
"That is something that nobody turns their attention to at the time. The original document is done. The legal issues are in that original document. For a practical point of view given the state of the economy these [clauses] might be something beneficial," said Len Rodness of Torkin Manes.

Some mortgages include a Rainy Day option. This option allows the borrower to skip one principal and interest payment each mortgage year. The interest portion of the skipped payment or payments will be added to the outstanding principal balance.
Read more: http://www.financialpost.com/personal-finance/mortgage-centre/story.html?id=2631845#ixzz0iTZkol9e

Financial Update for March 17, 2010

Flaherty not flinching as loonie nears parity
• TSX +80.60 to 12,089
• DOW +43.83
• Dollar +.55c to 98.62cUS closed higher for an 11th straight session hitting a 20 month high
• Oil +$1.90 to $81.70US per barrel.
• Gold +$17.10 to $1,122.20 USD per ounce

Flaherty not flinching as loonie nears parity
Nicolas Van Praet, Financial Post Montreal -- The era of fearing Canada's high-flying loonie might finally be passed.
Trading near US98.6¢, the dollar is now the closest it's been to one-on-one status with the U.S. greenback since July 2008. And Jim Flaherty, Canada's finance minister isn't flinching.
"We see where it's at now and it's competitive," Mr. Flaherty said of the currency's impact on the Canada's economy in an interview on Bloomberg Television. The economy could be at risk if the loonie rose to an uncompetitive level but that is not expected to happen, the minister said.
There was a time not so long ago when a loonie edging closer to parity with the U.S. dollar would trigger hoots of outrage from business leaders and federal opposition ranks alike, demanding the Canadian government do something to tame the bird or face ballooning welfare rolls and corporate bankruptcies. Just last summer, Mr. Flaherty himself expressed worry about the loonie's quick rise.
But the country has now lived with a Canadian currency that's stayed above US90¢ for much of the past year after hitting a high of US$1.10 in 2007. And today, that indignation may be over amid a raft of data suggesting Canada's economy is surging back to life.
The S&P/TSX Composite Index on Tuesday rose to its highest level has since September 2008. Oil prices firmed up past US$81 a barrel. New government data showed labour productivity improvements blasted past expectations to 1.4% in the fourth quarter -- the fastest rate in almost 12 years.
The governing Conservatives are also taking heart in this past Friday's labour force survey, which showed Canadian employers hired more people than expected. Employment has been on an upward trend since July 2009 as 159,000 jobs have been added over the past eight months. The economy grew at an annual rate of 5% in the fourth quarter.
But another key element is what's happening with manufacturers, who typically get hit when the Canadian dollar rises because the goods they sell outside the country become more expensive.
Fresh manufacturing figures Tuesday added to the evidence that Canadian companies are adjusting better than in the past to currency swings, as long as those swings aren't gigantic. January manufacturing sales rose 2.4% to $44.6-billion, a fifth straight month of growth for a sector hit hard by weak demand during the recession.
"For manufacturers, this situation now is really like a bad remake of Groundhog Day. We've seen this before," said Jeff Brownlee, spokesman for the Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters association. "What we've been saying to our members is that the new normal is the dollar at par or beyond. Par is not a ceiling. And if you can compete at par, and if the dollar doesn't go there, you're going to be making money."
Examples abound of Canadian exporters which have reinvented themselves or stepped up their game to stay alive and win in the face of a higher dollar. Kitchener, Ont.-based Christie Digital Systems Canada, Inc. realized the televisions it was making could no longer compete with cheaper-made Korean and Chinese rivals. So it switched its vocation and now makes advanced video projection systems used at concerts around the world.
Others have taken less dramatic steps, protecting themselves with currency option contracts, retooling plants with new machinery, or engineering their operations to ensure U.S. denominated revenue was used to pay U.S. suppliers.
"Exporters to the U.S. have had fair warning and they're tried to adjust to it. So maybe to some extent they've got used to it," said Dale Orr, an independent economist. "They've lost a little bit of steam in terms of getting public sympathy or government sympathy, that's for sure. It isn't there like it was."
Behind the latest numbers and the success stories however lies the stark fact that nothing dramatic has changed in the competitive fundamentals of Canadian companies over the past three years, warned Don Drummond, chief economist at TD Bank Financial group.
To take just one measure, although Canada's private sector productivity soared in the fourth quarter, it was its first uptick in more than a year and it fell during the recession as the United States' output per hour worked rose sharply. Productivity still trails that of our trading partner.
"Canadian businesses have not become more competitive this time around than they were the last time the dollar was reaching parity," Mr. Drummond said. "There's no tangible evidence looking at the productivity and the cost-effectiveness of the business sector to suggest that they're in a better position this time around. In fact if anything, they're worse."
Read more: http://www.financialpost.com/news-sectors/story.html?id=2690063#ixzz0iQxuJjCR